=I won't watch anything until you prove to be informated about WWII.
After you'll quote qhat i said responding to everything with smart argumentations i'll watch it.=
It is strong;)
Are you so much afraid of my propaganda in that film that you want me studying your propaganda but do not want to know anything from what I know?
:)Then I can say the same what u tell me: all this is a lie of fascists who want people to think that they are innocent.
Hebbels had the greatest abilities for propagandaand he performed them. And even now(yhat is very interesting to me) his propaganda is alive and you are brainwashed with it.
NATO nazi, fascists, illuminates,,, Al Qaeda - they all are evil and the enemies of people.
And there is something on the top of them...
30.09.2011, 01:34, "Fabio Fabio" <atem100@hotmail.it>:
>> I will say nothing on Hitler now because I do not want to heart your senses.
>
> You don't hear my senses IF you respond to what I said before, quoting everything I said and then responding.
> When you sent me your 1st post, i quoted you at every part you wrote and then I responded to every single part.
>
>> Till the time you get rid of idols it is imposible to speak on this topic.
>
> I've no idols :)
>
>> Fabio, do you mind if now we shell pay more attention on Libya and later return to the topic of WW II.
>
> I'm not forcing you to speak about WWII.
> You told that NATO was fascist, i responded that it was zionist, and then you sent me a long post
> with all propaganda stuff which i disagree since these things are already proved to be lies.
> The only correct thing you said is that Russian people suffered a lot.
> Everyone suffered in WWII.
> I'm not German, but i can say without any doubt that Germany was the victim,
> and the country who sufferend much more than any other.
>
>> And you too, please promise me to find this film in the whole : "Common Fascism" by Michail Romm ["Обыкновенный фашизм" , режиссер Михаил Ромм]. You will understand even if it is available only in Russian verse because images in this film are more important.
>
> I can't find it anyway i've seen many cruels images which proves NOTHING.
> I saw a lot of the so called "nazi's crimes" which in the end where proved to be
> american's crimes, for example by bombing.
>
> Here an example:
> http://ita.vho.org/valendy/Image2.gif
> Watch this image.
>
> 1)According propaganda this was a nazi's crime.
> Instead it was an american bombing who killed al these people.
> Do u remember the NATO'S war crimes image in Libya?
> Well, here is the same. Americans were bombing concentration's camps
> and then they were saying nazi were doing crimes, but actually
> their bodies show they died bcz of bombing and not bcz of what propaganda said.
>
> 2)I think you already know the video what shows very lean people in the NAZI'S concentrantions camp.
> Well there's a report of INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS OF GENEVRA 1948 (1600 PAGES)
> that demonstes how nazi always provided the food to prisoners, until
> BRITAIN AND US were starting bombing all the transportation's net
> and all machines to suplly food. Food couldn't arrive anymore there bcz of bombigs.
> Red Cross accused the barbaric bombing of US/BRITAIN.
> Think about it. If NAZI really wanted kill them, then they leave prisoners with no waters
> for 10 days and all of them will die. But they never wanted kill them.
> Red Cross's report proves it.
>
> This 1600 pages report is named in italian:
> "Rapporto del comitato internazionale della Croce Rossa sulla sua attività nella Seconda Guerra Mondiale"
> I don't know the english title.
>
> BTW when Red Army "liberated" Auscwhitz, that camp was already empty.
> All the movies they made AFTER that day only could show german prisoners.
>
> 3)Other imanges which the propaganda usually show to prove the nazi's war crimes are like this:
> http://ita.vho.org/valendy/Image11.jpg
> This isn't a photo. This is a DRAWING!
> Yet, they used this a drawing as "proof".
> Try to pay attentions at images: often they use drawings and then they say its a photo.
> Many of them are 100% faked.
>
> 4)Other example:
> This is image is photoshoped:
> http://ita.vho.org/valendy/Image4.gif
>
> They said this train were trasporting jewish.
> Well this is false, that was a normal train for merchandise's trasport.
> Infact the correct and original image is this:
> http://ita.vho.org/valendy/Image5.gif
>
> 5)There are many other images which were in part copied/paste from other pics.
> For example this:
> http://ita.vho.org/valendy/A2.jpg
>
> Real photo was this one:
> http://ita.vho.org/valendy/A1.jpg
>
> They cut a part of 1 photo, then pasted in an other.
>
> These are just few examples, actually there are hundreds of faked photos,
> or photos which show american's crimes for then saying it was a nazi's crime.
>
> Now tell me if NAZI were so cruel why the hell the US propaganda NEEDED to provide fake photos?
> It was easier just take a real photos without editing them?
> These are cleary FAKES! And when they're not fakes often the story isn't the one they spread in propaganda.
>
>> And then, after you watch this film we can continue our discussion in a spare time of fighting NATO - Al Qaeda-rebels-murders:)
>
> I won't watch anything until you prove to be informated about WWII.
> After you'll quote qhat i said responding to everything with smart argumentations i'll watch it.
> I've seen a lot of "documentaries" with cruels images to accusing for these nazi.
> When then it went proved that these weren't nazi's crimes.
> And even when NAZI were commiting crimes (because in war everyone is criminal)
> they weren't doing anything different from what US and Russia were already doing
> and that kept doing even AFTER WWII finished.
